Help people recognize and report risk.

Target practical human-risk challenges with focused learning and reporting-process improvements.

Illustrative team discussing a technology projectIllustrative image

Overview

Awareness programs are most useful when they reflect real workplace decisions. This offering considers roles, common threats, escalation expectations, and how to make security guidance easier to follow.

An assessment is time- and scope-bounded. Findings describe the tested conditions; they do not establish the absence of all vulnerabilities or guarantee a security outcome.

What the engagement examines

  • Security awareness program planning
  • Role-based training recommendations
  • Phishing recognition and reporting workflows
  • Executive and high-risk role briefings
  • Training effectiveness and feedback models

The work in practice

Choose examples from the audience’s actual work, such as sharing a document, verifying a supplier request or reporting a suspicious sign-in. Explain the desired behavior and make the reporting route easy to use. Measure whether the process becomes clearer, not simply whether people completed a lesson. Collect appropriate feedback and adjust the program. Training should support a safe reporting culture rather than discourage questions through blame.

Useful outputs. Not vague assurances.

  • Audience and risk needs assessment
  • Suggested training topics and cadence
  • Reporting and escalation recommendations
  • Practical program improvement plan

What you receive

  • Make secure behavior more actionable
  • Improve incident reporting confidence
  • Align training with business workflows

Clear decisions. Traceable delivery.

Scope & authorize

Agree on objectives, owners, boundaries, exclusions and the evidence needed to answer the question.

Review & validate

Perform the authorized work and record observations. Escalate critical findings through the agreed channel.

Explain & prioritize

Connect technical observations to business impact, practical actions and remaining uncertainties.

Handover & follow up

Review findings with your team and agree on any implementation or retest as a separate, traceable step.

Laptop showing a protective shield on the screenIllustrative image

Insights

Penetration testing, Red Team or Purple Team: choose the right assessment.

Choose by the decision you need to make, not by the most impressive service name. Scope, evidence and defensive readiness matter more than labels.

Read Full Guide

Before we get started.

Service scope, delivery terms and availability are agreed individually.

Is awareness training only about phishing?

No. It can include password and identity practices, data handling, social engineering, remote work, and incident reporting.

Can the training be customized?

Content and delivery format can be scoped by the audience and business processes involved.

What is needed before an engagement starts?

A confirmed scope, authorized owners, relevant access and agreed operating constraints. We do not begin intrusive testing based only on a general enquiry.

Will an assessment automatically change production systems?

No. Assessment and implementation are separate permissions. Any change requires approval, validation and an appropriate recovery plan.

Connected expertise.

Governance, Risk & Compliance

Translate security obligations and frameworks into practical policies, controls, and risk decisions.

View Service Details

Virtual CISO & Security Strategy

Security leadership support for risk prioritization, roadmaps, executive reporting, and vendor decisions.

View Service Details

Red Team Operations

Objective-led adversary emulation to test how people, processes, and technology respond to realistic attack paths.

View Service Details

Let’s make technology work better for you.

Tell us about the problem, the project or the next step. We’ll start with the scope — not a one-size-fits-all package.

Request a Consultation